24-02-2011
Power corp dropped Kodinar project over green concerns
Indian Express By Hiral Dave
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/power-corp-dropped-kodinar-project-over-green-concerns/754190/
* Now a consortium is working on greendfield port and power plant project at site
The Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited (GSECL) had dropped a site in Kodinar taluka of Junagadh district last year for a proposed thermal power plant for two reasons: the site fell under the Coastal Regulatory Zone(CRZ) and the land was agricultural. But the same site has now been allocated to Shapporji Pallanji Energy (Gujarat) Private Limited (SPEL) for a power plant and a coal jetty project.
There are also three reserved forest areas and five water bodies within a radius of 9 km from the proposed site. These reserve forests at Sarkhai, Nanavad and Chhara, located in the periphery of Gir Wildlife Sanctuary, are the migratory routes for the Asiatic lions.
The site in question involves five villages in Kodinar taluka – Sarkhadi, Chhara, Kaj, Velan and Kodinar. GSECL was planning two 800 MW coal-based power plants, while SPEL has proposed to set up two 660 MW plants and a coal jetty for which the public hearing on environment clearance was held in November 2010.
In a letter to Kodinar MLA Dhirsinh Barad, dated May 27 2010, D J Pandiyan, Principal Secretary, Energy and Petrochemicals said: "Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited had considered Chhara and Sarkhadi for two 800 MW power plants, but the project has been dropped as these villages fall under CRZ and has rich agricultural land." A copy of the letter is with The Indian Express. The letter also contained an attached letter by P H Rana, Managing Director, GSECL, which said: "For two 800 MW power plant that GSECL had been considering to build, a proposal to the collector had been sent to acquire land at Sarkhadi, Kaj and Velan villages. But as large part of site comes under CRZ, the proposal was dropped. Later on, site at Chhara village was considered but as a large part was found to be agricultural land, the proposal was again dropped."
Nevertheless, the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) conducted a public hearing last November in connection with the development of Greenfield Port at Chhara by the SPEL – AFCONS – Forbes consortium for the proposed thermal power plants of 1,320 MW capacity within the revenue limits of Kaj village. The distance between the proposed coal-based thermal power plants and the Greenfield Port at Chhara village is about three km.
Villagers have alleged that Junagadh MP Dinu Solanki and District Collector A M Parmar did not allow them to raise environment issues. They have since filed a PIL with the High Court demanding re-hearing of the matter. The HC has issued notice to the state government and the Centre in response to the PIL.
Barad said: "The land is very fertile and the villagers grow two crops per season, which includes groundnut, wheat, coconut, sunflower and sugarcane. I don't have any idea why permission has been given to SPEL, when the state government's own company did not feel right to go ahead for environment reasons. We are not against industrialisation, but blind progress."
Industry Commissioner G G Swain denied having details of the project with his department. Pandiyan said: "Shapporji Pallanji Energy Limited have proposed a power plant at Kodinar. But I have no knowledge that earlier GSECL had considered the same site. Land acquisition is a matter between the collectorate and the private parties when a company purchases it from farmers."
When SPEL reportedly began purchasing farmland from the locals, Parmar maintained that the site does not cover agricultural land or comes under CRZ.
Jagu Kamaliya, deputy sarpanch of Charra village, however, said: "The company contacted us for some 1,000 bigha in our village near the sea. It is very much under CRZ. The company also contacted us to buy our farms. So it is wrong to say that it is not agricultural land." The villagers claim they have been offered Rs. 2 to 5 lakh per bigha for their agricultural land.
Parmar added: "This time, the survey has been done from a different angle. The site no longer falls under CRZ or includes agricultural land."
The site of the proposed power plant in Kodinar taluka of Junagadh district. Express Photo
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Previous Posts
-
►
2024
(1)
- ► January 2024 (1)
-
►
2022
(3)
- ► December 2022 (1)
- ► October 2022 (1)
- ► March 2022 (1)
-
►
2021
(3)
- ► November 2021 (1)
- ► September 2021 (1)
- ► January 2021 (1)
-
►
2020
(4)
- ► November 2020 (1)
- ► September 2020 (1)
- ► January 2020 (1)
-
►
2019
(78)
- ► April 2019 (1)
- ► March 2019 (1)
- ► February 2019 (39)
- ► January 2019 (37)
-
►
2018
(148)
- ► December 2018 (19)
- ► October 2018 (14)
- ► August 2018 (18)
- ► April 2018 (8)
- ► March 2018 (24)
- ► February 2018 (5)
- ► January 2018 (8)
-
►
2017
(156)
- ► December 2017 (6)
- ► November 2017 (14)
- ► October 2017 (12)
- ► September 2017 (10)
- ► August 2017 (10)
- ► April 2017 (14)
- ► March 2017 (26)
- ► February 2017 (9)
- ► January 2017 (16)
-
►
2016
(128)
- ► December 2016 (49)
- ► November 2016 (2)
- ► September 2016 (5)
- ► August 2016 (4)
- ► April 2016 (6)
- ► March 2016 (6)
- ► February 2016 (10)
- ► January 2016 (3)
-
►
2015
(165)
- ► December 2015 (17)
- ► November 2015 (1)
- ► September 2015 (10)
- ► April 2015 (33)
- ► March 2015 (1)
- ► February 2015 (8)
- ► January 2015 (4)
-
►
2014
(139)
- ► December 2014 (4)
- ► November 2014 (8)
- ► October 2014 (15)
- ► September 2014 (12)
- ► August 2014 (21)
- ► April 2014 (14)
- ► March 2014 (8)
- ► February 2014 (9)
- ► January 2014 (6)
-
►
2013
(308)
- ► December 2013 (13)
- ► November 2013 (22)
- ► October 2013 (26)
- ► September 2013 (15)
- ► August 2013 (49)
- ► April 2013 (75)
- ► March 2013 (20)
- ► February 2013 (32)
- ► January 2013 (17)
-
►
2012
(493)
- ► December 2012 (19)
- ► November 2012 (28)
- ► October 2012 (14)
- ► September 2012 (14)
- ► August 2012 (32)
- ► April 2012 (69)
- ► March 2012 (84)
- ► February 2012 (20)
- ► January 2012 (49)
-
▼
2011
(296)
- ► December 2011 (50)
- ► November 2011 (38)
- ► October 2011 (8)
- ► September 2011 (10)
- ► August 2011 (18)
- ► April 2011 (21)
- ► March 2011 (26)
-
▼
February 2011
(23)
- In fallen Jethava’s Kodinar, locals rise to hold fort
- Power corp dropped Kodinar project over green conc...
- Gujarat seeks Central nod for ring road around Gir
- Gujarat declares six zones as ‘eco-fragile’
- State seeks Rs600 crore for road around Gir sanctuary
- Second chargesheet filed in Amit Jethava murder case
- Can’t satisfy all demands of green activists: Jairam
- Ramesh launches consortium to save vultures
- Lion-hearted pride adopts 15-mth-old cub
- Ropeway will reduce labour of Girnar trek
- First vulture chick born at Sakkarbaug zoo
- Not lions, but vultures cause of worry
- ‘MoEF condition may make Girnar ropeway non-viable’
- Girnar ropeway will 'sound death knell for Gir vul...
- Jairam clears Gujarat ropeway project with vulture...
- Ramesh’s plan not feasible, say government, contra...
- Ramesh clears Girnar ropeway project
- Non-violence in Lion Kingdom
- SAVING INDIA’S PRIDE
- Junagadh, the Buddhist centre of Gujarat
- State to convert 11 villages on Gir periphery to r...
- Maldharis want to live close to lions
- New plan to move Maldharis out of Gir
- ► January 2011 (23)
-
►
2010
(415)
- ► December 2010 (34)
- ► November 2010 (18)
- ► October 2010 (16)
- ► September 2010 (21)
- ► August 2010 (16)
- ► April 2010 (58)
- ► March 2010 (60)
- ► February 2010 (51)
- ► January 2010 (31)
-
►
2009
(316)
- ► December 2009 (31)
- ► November 2009 (27)
- ► October 2009 (38)
- ► September 2009 (21)
- ► August 2009 (27)
- ► April 2009 (21)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► February 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (20)
-
►
2008
(342)
- ► December 2008 (16)
- ► November 2008 (16)
- ► October 2008 (29)
- ► September 2008 (26)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (51)
- ► March 2008 (37)
- ► February 2008 (18)
- ► January 2008 (32)
-
►
2007
(254)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (15)
- ► October 2007 (21)
- ► September 2007 (13)
- ► August 2007 (21)
- ► April 2007 (63)
- ► March 2007 (21)
- ► February 2007 (5)
- ► January 2007 (8)
-
►
2006
(32)
- ► December 2006 (6)
- ► November 2006 (7)
- ► October 2006 (3)
- ► September 2006 (15)
- ► August 2006 (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment