16-02-2011
Ropeway will reduce labour of Girnar trek
DNA By GA Patel
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/analysis_ropeway-will-reduce-labour-of-girnar-trek_1508734
The proponent company desires to establish a ropeway from the foothills ofMount Girnar to Ambaji Temple at the top to cater to the pilgrim traffic.
There are approximately 10,000 steps en route and it takes anywhere between 4 and 6 hours for able bodied pilgrims to climb to the temple and more than that for old or infirm pilgrims who are actually ferried by doli bearers.
There are hundreds of small shops and stalls catering to the various needs of the pilgrims on the way. The trek is strenuous.
Therefore, besides materials like coconut, incense sticks etc required for worship, the pilgrims need water, snacks and other things on the way. All of these are provided by enterprising locals.
There is also the question of litter and refuse being generated and disposed of along the way due the aforesaid activities.
Girnar was declared a Wildlife Sanctuary in 2008. It is an important habitat for myriad variety of ungulates, birds and most significantly for a stable meta-population of two dozen or more lions that retain a dynamic genetic link with the main lion population of Gir.
Girnar is also rich in plants of medicinal value and in general floral biodiversity.
The entire area can be divided into three parts from the point of view of habitat use and suitability.
The lower portion, consisting of valleys, grasslands and fringes is suitable mainly for spotted deer and lions. The middle reaches are more suitable for sambhar and leopards whereas the higher reaches are by and large devoid of animal life except for a few specific nesting and roosting sites for vultures.
In this background it is the case of the proponent company that the proposed project, instead of leaning on the argument that it would cause minimal damage, actually makes a positive assertion to the fact that by causing a one time, reversible and revocable damage of miniscule proportions in the extreme short term, the project would actually cause a number of positive benefits to the area which would enhance it habitat value for the present denizens.
The total land based footprint of the project within Girnar Sanctuary is only about 8 ha. It consists of an embarkation station, a landing station and a few pylons in between to support the cables.
The number of trees required to be cut are minimal. Moreover, both the stations are situated in areas that even otherwise experience high disturbance due to pilgrim traffic.
Thus, establishment of these two stations is not likely to increase the disturbance any further. On the contrary channelising the pilgrim traffic it would actually reduce disorder at both points.
There are thousands of pilgrims who spend anywhere between ten to 20 hours in making one round trip and during which time they must necessarily cater to bodily needs of nourishment, thirst and nature's calls.
The ropeway will reduce the time spent by pilgrims inside the sanctuary by a huge factor. It is expected that a round trip should take on an average three to four hours or less depending upon the traffic at the temple as per different seasons.
Thus the project would reduce by a significant factor the total number of pilgrim man hours inside the sanctuary. By reducing this time it would entail that the needs of water, snacks and nature calls would also be drastically reduced. The arduousness of the trek would be eliminated.
The hundreds of shops and stalls en route could then be relocated conveniently near the embarkation and landing areas.
In doing so the total disturbance caused all along the route would be greatly reduced and would actually become limited to the two areas only. It would be possible then to devise a system for collection and disposal of waste and refuse and take it out of Gir Sanctuary.
This trash, presently, is strewn all along the steps. Some of it is not biodegradable while some of it being surplus food attracts scavenging.
The plastic litter is ingested by ungulates and ruminants. By providing a chance to make the route garbage-free the project actually has the potential of improving the habitat quality.
There would also be reduction in noise pollution due to the reduction in the total number of pilgrim man hours spent inside the sanctuary.
The proponent company operates a similar ropeway in Pavagadh, near Halol, in Panchmahal district. It is the claim of the proponent that the area today experiences virtually no pedestrian traffic on the trek from the bottom of Pavagadh to the top.
The area over a long duration has reverted to being a disturbance free forest. It is asserted that over a long duration the entire step route is likely to become devoid of human activity and would thus become a better habitat than it is now as a direct consequence of the project.
The project does not impinge in any way on the middle reaches and it has no negative or positive impacts thereon. The landing site at the top is on the opposite aspect of the hill where nesting and roosting site for vultures have been noticed.
In any case the project does not add to the disturbance that is any case being experienced now due to pilgrim activities. On the contrary by confining the anthropogenic activities in a small area and managing the pilgrim traffic in an orderly and an organized manner the project actually seeks to reduce the disturbance at the tip of the hill.
There are only 13 support towers that are required to be established en route and their footprints would be minimal.
Trees are required to be cut only in the area of the actual construction. Finally, by providing the visitors with a panoramic view of Girnar Sanctuary the proponents hope that the pilgrims would appreciate the habitat value of the area better and would thus help in raising awareness about the conservation value of forests in general and Girnar Sanctuary in particular.
All alternatives before site selection were considered and the present site was selected keeping in view the least possible damage to forests and biotic interference in the area.
Even a parliament committee headed by ex. forest minister GOI, Dr. Soze, along with 9 MPs visited the site in view of the 'Girnar Ropeway Project' issue raised by Mrs. Meneka Gandhi in parliament and they also agreed with the selection of the present site for the Ropeway Project.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Previous Posts
-
►
2024
(1)
- ► January 2024 (1)
-
►
2022
(3)
- ► December 2022 (1)
- ► October 2022 (1)
- ► March 2022 (1)
-
►
2021
(3)
- ► November 2021 (1)
- ► September 2021 (1)
- ► January 2021 (1)
-
►
2020
(4)
- ► November 2020 (1)
- ► September 2020 (1)
- ► January 2020 (1)
-
►
2019
(78)
- ► April 2019 (1)
- ► March 2019 (1)
- ► February 2019 (39)
- ► January 2019 (37)
-
►
2018
(148)
- ► December 2018 (19)
- ► October 2018 (14)
- ► August 2018 (18)
- ► April 2018 (8)
- ► March 2018 (24)
- ► February 2018 (5)
- ► January 2018 (8)
-
►
2017
(156)
- ► December 2017 (6)
- ► November 2017 (14)
- ► October 2017 (12)
- ► September 2017 (10)
- ► August 2017 (10)
- ► April 2017 (14)
- ► March 2017 (26)
- ► February 2017 (9)
- ► January 2017 (16)
-
►
2016
(128)
- ► December 2016 (49)
- ► November 2016 (2)
- ► September 2016 (5)
- ► August 2016 (4)
- ► April 2016 (6)
- ► March 2016 (6)
- ► February 2016 (10)
- ► January 2016 (3)
-
►
2015
(165)
- ► December 2015 (17)
- ► November 2015 (1)
- ► September 2015 (10)
- ► April 2015 (33)
- ► March 2015 (1)
- ► February 2015 (8)
- ► January 2015 (4)
-
►
2014
(139)
- ► December 2014 (4)
- ► November 2014 (8)
- ► October 2014 (15)
- ► September 2014 (12)
- ► August 2014 (21)
- ► April 2014 (14)
- ► March 2014 (8)
- ► February 2014 (9)
- ► January 2014 (6)
-
►
2013
(308)
- ► December 2013 (13)
- ► November 2013 (22)
- ► October 2013 (26)
- ► September 2013 (15)
- ► August 2013 (49)
- ► April 2013 (75)
- ► March 2013 (20)
- ► February 2013 (32)
- ► January 2013 (17)
-
►
2012
(493)
- ► December 2012 (19)
- ► November 2012 (28)
- ► October 2012 (14)
- ► September 2012 (14)
- ► August 2012 (32)
- ► April 2012 (69)
- ► March 2012 (84)
- ► February 2012 (20)
- ► January 2012 (49)
-
▼
2011
(296)
- ► December 2011 (50)
- ► November 2011 (38)
- ► October 2011 (8)
- ► September 2011 (10)
- ► August 2011 (18)
- ► April 2011 (21)
- ► March 2011 (26)
-
▼
February 2011
(23)
- In fallen Jethava’s Kodinar, locals rise to hold fort
- Power corp dropped Kodinar project over green conc...
- Gujarat seeks Central nod for ring road around Gir
- Gujarat declares six zones as ‘eco-fragile’
- State seeks Rs600 crore for road around Gir sanctuary
- Second chargesheet filed in Amit Jethava murder case
- Can’t satisfy all demands of green activists: Jairam
- Ramesh launches consortium to save vultures
- Lion-hearted pride adopts 15-mth-old cub
- Ropeway will reduce labour of Girnar trek
- First vulture chick born at Sakkarbaug zoo
- Not lions, but vultures cause of worry
- ‘MoEF condition may make Girnar ropeway non-viable’
- Girnar ropeway will 'sound death knell for Gir vul...
- Jairam clears Gujarat ropeway project with vulture...
- Ramesh’s plan not feasible, say government, contra...
- Ramesh clears Girnar ropeway project
- Non-violence in Lion Kingdom
- SAVING INDIA’S PRIDE
- Junagadh, the Buddhist centre of Gujarat
- State to convert 11 villages on Gir periphery to r...
- Maldharis want to live close to lions
- New plan to move Maldharis out of Gir
- ► January 2011 (23)
-
►
2010
(415)
- ► December 2010 (34)
- ► November 2010 (18)
- ► October 2010 (16)
- ► September 2010 (21)
- ► August 2010 (16)
- ► April 2010 (58)
- ► March 2010 (60)
- ► February 2010 (51)
- ► January 2010 (31)
-
►
2009
(316)
- ► December 2009 (31)
- ► November 2009 (27)
- ► October 2009 (38)
- ► September 2009 (21)
- ► August 2009 (27)
- ► April 2009 (21)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► February 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (20)
-
►
2008
(342)
- ► December 2008 (16)
- ► November 2008 (16)
- ► October 2008 (29)
- ► September 2008 (26)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (51)
- ► March 2008 (37)
- ► February 2008 (18)
- ► January 2008 (32)
-
►
2007
(254)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (15)
- ► October 2007 (21)
- ► September 2007 (13)
- ► August 2007 (21)
- ► April 2007 (63)
- ► March 2007 (21)
- ► February 2007 (5)
- ► January 2007 (8)
-
►
2006
(32)
- ► December 2006 (6)
- ► November 2006 (7)
- ► October 2006 (3)
- ► September 2006 (15)
- ► August 2006 (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment